The football business
The Men Who Changed Football
BBC TV
Reviewed by John Reid
TEN YEARS ago the Football Association announced the setting
up of the Premier League. In a recent BBC TV series, The Men Who Changed
Football, those behind this decision claimed that, in setting up the Premier
League, they had transformed a game that was in terminal decline into a thriving
business.
In 1992, at the outset of the first Premier League season,
the Socialist Party, then known as Militant Labour, published a pamphlet, Reclaim
the Game, predicting that this new league would drive working class fans
away from the game and possibly lead in the long-term to the death of many
clubs. The Men Who Changed Football confirmed that this is indeed the
direction in which our game is moving.
Football is an international game which has existed for
thousands of years in many different forms. Variations were played thousands of
years ago in China, Greece and Rome. Roman soldiers introduced their variation
of football, Harpastum, to England. The ‘folk football’ that developed from
this Roman activity in the Middle Ages was a mass participation game, involving
whole villages.
The development of industry from the mid- to late-18th
century onwards saw the mass migration of peasants from the countryside into the
new booming cities. Work was often 16 hours a day with the only break on Sundays
and church holidays. The state and the church, however, banned Sunday
recreation. Their aim was to regulate and discipline workers around the needs of
industry and profit. There were campaigns against sport, particularly folk
football. In the early 19th century employers joined forces with
other propertied groups to ban football matches.
It was only with the rise of trade unionism and the fight
for the introduction of a shorter working week, including a free Saturday
afternoon, that workers were able to indulge in leisure activity. That is why
many of the original clubs were formed in the industrial and unionised areas of
Sheffield, Lancashire, the Midlands and Glasgow, between 1860 and 1870. The
early rules of the game may have been drafted by public schools and universities
(the Cambridge rules of 1848), but the driving force behind the development of
football in an organised, league form, came from the industrial working classes
of England and Scotland.
Manchester United and Arsenal, for example, were originally
works teams. As Simon Inglis explains in The Football Grounds of Great
Britain, in reference to Arsenal’s history, ‘until the turn of the
century it had been run essentially by exiled northern working men… But the
outbreak of the Boer War in 1899 meant more overtime for the men and less time
spent on the football club, which soon ran into debt. The organisers had never
wanted it to become a proprietary or capitalist club’.
The game became hugely popular and very soon local
businessmen took over clubs mainly for prestige but also to receive some
monetary gain. Stadiums were developed (many not improved for decades) and
people packed in, paying for admission. For the first time profit became an
issue and football became an ‘industry’. Until the advent of the Premier
League, however, revenue used to be shared by clubs in all four divisions. There
was at least a pretence of equity.
Manchester United chairman Martin Edwards, one of the movers
of the breakaway Premier League, complained that the smaller clubs among the
Football League’s 92 clubs were ‘bleeding the game to death’; they were
not viable as businesses and ought to be put to sleep. The advent of the ‘greed
is good’ league in 1992 marked the final transformation of the peoples’ game
into just another branch of the big business corporate entertainment industry.
Football is more and more about merchandising a corporate image than the actual
game itself. Manchester United describes itself as a ‘world brand’ to rival
Macdonald’s.
The transformation of football reflects the trends in
capitalism, the neo-liberalism of Thatcherism and Blairism. The aim of the
chairmen of the big clubs is to ‘rationalise’ the football industry by the
unleashing of brutal market forces.
On the surface football has appeared to go through a boom
period in the last ten years, spanking new stadiums (built partly out of tax
payers money), attendances up, the cream of world football playing in the
Premier League.
But the real fans are gradually being cut off from attending
the game. The Taylor report written after the Hillsborough disaster of 1989,
advocated all-seater stadiums. The football chairmen used this report to
massively increase admission prices (although this was never intended by the
report). Prices soared to £25 plus whereas if ticket prices had kept place with
inflation it would only cost around £8 to see a match. Supporters from social
class A and B now outnumber those from social classes D and E.
The vast increase in football finances was driven by the
commercial exploitation of ‘brand loyalty’. This loyalty was built up over
generations of working class fans, passing their club allegiance from generation
to generation. The transformation of the game away from working class support is
cutting the new generation off from watching live football. The bubble is
starting to burst.
Clubs floated on the stock exchange as a result of the
billion pound plus put into the football industry by the Sky television deals of
1992 and 1996. These deals, plus the massive increases in ticket prices and the
sale of merchandise, including replica shirts, initially saw the value of
football clubs soar on the stock exchange. Now, as The Observer business section
(8 April) says, "the city’s love affair with football is well and truly
over". All clubs, including Manchester United, have seen the value of their
shares fall, even before the recession bites. City analysts and institutional
shareholders complain that the football Plc’s spend a much higher proportion
of their revenues on salaries than any other type of business.
Even future big television deals are not certain. There are
signs of boredom with saturated TV coverage. It is no longer the sure-fire
audience driver that it once was. Television ratings for the
designed-for-television UEFA Champions League are disappointing. As The Observer
says, "the danger is that the new commercial version of the game – made
for television and performed by individual stars paid millions – will fail to
recruit the next generation of addicted consumers".
The only way football can be saved is by working class fans
reclaiming the game. We the fans are still the biggest sponsors of football and
we should, through a ballot of club members, be able to elect the boards of our
clubs. Also on such boards would be elected players and club staff
representatives. Local councils should also be involved in running clubs, to
ensure full use of their facilities by the whole community.
The development of football was and is linked with the
development of capitalism and the profit system. The fight to democratise
football is linked with getting rid of big business domination within it. The
same people and corporations who now own and control our teams and threaten
their future existence also control our workplaces and decide whether or not
these stay open. Socialists must link the battle to sack the boards at our clubs
with the struggle to sack the boards at our workplace, to replace the anarchy of
the profit system, capitalism, with a system democratically owned, controlled
and run by the majority in society, the working class.
But if big business did not control and run football, how
would it be run? I believe a socialist society could guarantee and protect the
existence of all clubs, league and non-league. Football clubs are an integral
part of working class communities.
Clubs would be community and supporter-run and non
profit-making. Supporters would not just be involved in turning up to watch.
There would be a proper club structure where people could enrol with the club of
their allegiance for a nominal fee. It would be a sports club, with fans, if
they wished, playing for their club in leagues based on ability. People of all
ages, men, women, able-bodied and disabled, would be enabled to play for their
club.
At the moment many players receive millionaire wages. But
these players see a vast profit being made by the directors of the game and have
tried to secure a share for themselves. Under socialism players would receive
good wages, there would be differentials based on the level of the league, but
these wages would be tied to the wages of a skilled worker.
Football came from the masses and to ensure the survival of
every club we must fight to reclaim the game. This may sound like a dream but
the alternative is the nightmare of many clubs, including some of the so-called
big clubs, going out of business.
|