Capitalism up close
Too Big to Fail: Inside the Battle to Save
Wall Street
By Andrew Ross Sorkin
Penguin, 2010, £10-99
Reviewed by
Sean Figg
IN THE space of several weeks
in September and October 2008 the global financial system and its
heartland, the USA’s Wall Street, was "changed almost beyond
recognition". We are still living with the calamitous consequences two
years later.
The key event in this saga
was of course the bankruptcy of Lehman Brothers. By the end of September
2008, the five biggest US investment banks had failed, were sold, or
were converted into bank-holding companies; two mortgage-lending giants
and the world’s largest insurer were placed under government control;
and rescue packages totalling $1.1 trillion had been doled out to keep
these institutions, and the US economy, afloat.
Author Andrew Sorkin is well
placed to describe the events of those tumultuous weeks. As mergers and
acquisitions reporter for the New York Times, Sorkin had access to all
the key individuals involved. Although not a participant in the events
he reported on them as they were developing. Too Big to Fail is in
essence a re-working and supplementing of that reporting into a
minute-by-minute narrative.
Too Big to Fail is a unique
book. The content is that of current affairs, its style that of a
thriller. The protagonists – the CEOs and politicians – are introduced
in the same way as characters would be in a fast-paced novel. The
feelings and motivations of these characters take centre stage as the
plot unfolds. The chapters are like the scenes of a screenplay; we
encounter the characters mid-action, and join and leave them at dramatic
points in the story. This is compelling reading but may be a rather
frivolous way of treating the subject. This is not necessarily the
author’s fault. Many of the accounts show the frivolity with which
decisions that would effect the lives of millions were treated. Consider
this account of how the dollar figure for the bailout of Wall Street was
arrived at:
"Back in his office…
[Paulson] met with Fromer and Kashkari and debated what the precise cost
might be. ‘What about $1 trillion?’, Kashkari said. ‘No way’, Fromer
said. ‘Okay’, Kashkari said. ‘How about $700 billion?’ ‘I don’t know’,
Fromer said. ‘That’s better than $1 trillion’. The numbers were, at
best, guesstimates, and all three men knew it. The relevant figure would
ultimately be the one that represented the most they could possibly ask
for from Congress without raising too many questions. Whatever the sum
turned out to be, they knew they could count on Kashkari to perform some
sort of mathematical voodoo to justify it… As he plucked numbers from
thin air even Kashkari laughed at the absurdity of it all".
These anecdotes are meant to
be punchy and human, bringing the story to life. They do that, but for
socialists they do more. The huge power so casually wielded to such
devastating effect for so many millions by a tiny clique is profoundly
disturbing. It shows that after the recognition of their ‘mistake’ in
allowing Lehman Brothers to collapse anything and everything would be
done to save the financial system in the interests of capitalism.
The main source for the book
is "more than five hundred hours of interviews with more than two
hundred individuals who participated directly in the events surrounding
the financial crisis. These individuals include Wall Street chief
executives, board members, management teams, current and former US
government officials, foreign government officials, bankers, lawyers,
accountants, consultants, and other advisors". From this, one has to
wonder whether this book is the ‘official’ account of the economic
crisis by the US establishment. Although not his intention – Sorkin
would undoubtedly jealously defend his journalistic independence – in
many ways he is allowing these individuals to tell their story through
him.
The thoughts and feelings
ascribed to the ‘characters’ can only have come from interviews with the
individuals themselves, people that knew them, or speculation on the
part of Sorkin. Compelling reading maybe, but not necessarily objective
fact. It is only in the eleven pages of the epilogue that he offers his
own analysis of what his previous five hundred pages have described in
painstaking detail. In a rare moment expressing his own view, Sorkin
comments that of the many "characters in this drama" their "primary
motive was to save themselves". Even if these accounts were one hundred
per cent accurate, the value that they have for a real understanding of
what unfolded in those weeks is still debatable. These larger than life
characters, bombastic and arrogant, can obscure the fact demonstrated
throughout the pages of the book, but never really articulated, that
they were mere leaves in the wind of massive economic forces outside of
any individual’s control.
The myth of fierce capitalist
competition is unconsciously dealt a blow in this book. Despite heading
rival banks supposedly competing with each other, all the CEOs,
directors and politicians live intertwined lives. Career paths traverse
the same organisations and back again; from boardroom to boardroom, to
government office and back again. Hank Paulson, Treasury Secretary, was
previously the CEO of Goldman Sachs. Almost all the players are on first
name terms with each other. The eventual portrayal of ‘cut-throat
capitalism’ is more akin to that of a ‘gentleman’s game’ where the
intention is never to deal a death blow to one another but to be ‘good
sports’ and concede when one is ‘out-foxed’ and brag when one is ahead.
And the point should be emphasised that despite playing key roles in the
wrecking of the world economy, the book’s ‘characters’ are all still
millionaires.
None of the above is intended
to condemn Too Big to Fail. It is what it is and the author has not
promised us more. On its own, it is not sufficient for understanding all
the issues involved in the eruption of the world economic crisis. But
nevertheless it is a good supplement to more analytical works available,
including previous coverage in the pages of Socialism Today.