
Workers� political representation: where now?
ON WINNING the recent Dunfermline and West Fife
by-election, Liberal Democrat Willie Rennie said: "Labour has taken the
people up and down the country for granted for far too long, too much
spin and not enough delivery � it is time that Tony Blair and Gordon
Brown both got that message". Losing a majority of more than 11,500
votes in the time since the May 2005 general election is a serious blow
for New Labour, especially in a constituency neighbouring that of the
Chancellor, Gordon Brown.
While the government may blame this defeat on local
issues, it is clear that many people have lost faith in the Labour
Party, are either looking elsewhere for candidates they believe better
represent them or, in increasing numbers, are not voting at all. Turnout
in the Dunfermline and West Fife by-election was down by 11.21% on the
May 2005 figures.
This has occurred in the period leading up to the
first local elections in London since the invasion of Iraq and there are
widespread expectations that Labour will lose a significant number of
council seats, and may even lose control of a number of councils. In a
bizarre twist of fate, Blair is now at least partly relying on the
relative popularity of the once-expelled Ken Livingstone. The mayor�s
support for the government�s anti-social behaviour agenda and recently
announced budget for increased police numbers are having an effect on
the perception of crime in the capital � leading to some media
speculation that this may translate into votes. Its effect, however, is
likely to be very limited.
More important, is the anger that is building as
Blair seeks to push more of his �legacy agenda� through parliament. The
education reforms and introduction of city academies have provoked mass
outcry and several local action groups have been established to organise
a fight-back. Similarly, the increasing privatisation of the NHS has
been extremely unpopular and this has been shown by the significant size
of local demonstrations in affected areas.
Attempts to raise the retirement age and reduce
public-sector pensions have come up against considerable opposition from
workers, and the government is facing a huge battle with the trade
unions on this issue.
The working class is increasingly looking for a
political alternative and therefore it is becoming more and more urgent
that steps are taken towards the establishment of a new mass workers�
party in England and Wales. To this end, the Socialist Party launched
the Campaign for a New Workers� Party at the Socialism 2005 event last
November.
The move to the right of the Labour Party � a
process started by Neil Kinnock and continued and accelerated by Blair �
is well documented. The fight of the three mainstream parties is now for
the so-called �centre ground� in politics.
The leader of the Conservative Party, David Cameron,
recently said, that the "alternative to fighting for the centre ground
is irrelevance, defeat and failure". The same could be attributed to the
Liberal Democrats and acting leader, Sir Menzies (�Ming�) Campbell, who
has praised the role of the private sector in delivering public services
and ruled out increasing levels of public spending. The Economist
magazine commented: "Sir Ming is as sure that there is no politically
attractive space much to the left of Labour as Mr Cameron is that there
is none much to the right".
However, this view is not shared by a growing number
of workers, trade unionists, young people and environmental, anti-war
and community activists. People who have been involved in fighting
against the policies of this contested �centre ground� know its true
nature and are looking for something new to emerge to fight in their
interests.
The National Union of Rail, Maritime and Transport
Workers (RMT) called a conference in January to discuss the crisis in
working-class representation. This event was well attended by many
sections of the labour movement and the idea of a new workers� party was
warmly received. Unfortunately, the conference did not debate or vote on
resolutions and a way forward was not agreed.
RMT general secretary, Bob Crow, spoke about the
importance of rebuilding the shop stewards� movement. There is no doubt
that this would be a very welcome development, but it is not a
precondition for the establishment of a new party of the working class.
A new party would be invaluable in raising the confidence of workers
and, in turn, would almost certainly lead to a strengthening of the
trade union and shop stewards� movements in general.
Significantly, there was no argument at the
conference that reclaiming the Labour Party was the way forward or
indeed possible, even from the left-wing Campaign Group Labour MP, John
McDonnell, who spoke from the platform.
Now, the next step for the Campaign for a New
Workers� Party is to build for the conference that has been called for
Sunday 19 March at the University of London Union. This will be an
opportunity for all those in favour of working towards a new party to
discuss, debate and agree the next steps in the campaign. It will also
be an important opportunity to bring together activists from different
areas to plan how they can work together to build support for the idea
of a new workers� party.
The aim of the 19 March conference should not be
just to regroup the existing left under a new banner to create a
�Socialist Alliance Mark II�. New forces must be drawn into the campaign
in order to make the goal of a new mass workers� party achievable in the
future. The conference should be seen as an initial first step towards
this potential wider movement.
Trade union branches, community groups and other
organisations are invited to send delegates to the conference and
individuals are also welcome to attend.
A new party or even a �pre-party� formation,
launched to represent the working class, would be a substantial step
forward at this time. This is true even though its programme, as decided
through democratic discussion, may not initially provide a thoroughly
worked-out plan on how demands could be won and achievements sustained
in the long run. Such a new formation would draw workers and others into
struggle, and Marxists will undoubtedly engage, discuss, debate and
explain the necessary tactics and methods needed to establish a
socialist society that would benefit the majority of people instead of a
rich minority. The 19 March conference is the next step on this road.
Fiona Pashazadeh
For more
information on the Campaign for a New Workers� Party and the 19 March
conference, go to
www.cnwp.org.uk, email info@cnwp.org.uk or write to CNWP, PO Box
858, London E11 1YG
Dunfermline & West Fife by-election - 9 February 2006
Liberal Democrats: 12,391 (35.8%)
New Labour: 10,591 (30.6%)
Scottish National Party (SNP): 7,261 (21%)
Tories: 2,702 (7.8%)
Scottish Socialist Party (SSP): 537 (1.6%)
Scottish Christian Party: 411 (1.2%)
Abolish Forth Bridge Tolls Party: 374 (1.1%)
UK Independence Party (UKIP): 208 (0.6%)
Common Good: 103 (0.3%)
Turnout: 34,578 (49%)
2005 general election:
New Labour: 20,111 (47.4%); Liberal Democrats:
8,549 (20.2%); SNP: 8,026 (18.9%); Tories: 4,376 (10.3%); SSP: 689
(1.6%); UKIP: 643 (1.5%)
Turnout: 42,394 (59.9%)
Notional election result 2001
(Although the constituency did not exist in 2001,
psephologists produced the following figures as a guide.)
New Labour: 22,070 (54.5%); SNP: 7,222 (17.8%);
Liberal Democrats: 5,773 (14.3%); Tories: 3,919 (9.7%); SSP: 971
(2.4%); UKIP: 559 (1.4%)
|