|
|

Scotland: voters reject the Westminster cuts
coalition
THE FORMATION of the
Conservative-Liberal coalition in Westminster will open up a period of
instability and class conflict not seen in Scotland and Britain for
decades. The character of this government is already clear. It is a
government for the rich elite who have declared war against public
services, jobs, pensions, benefits and education. The scale of the cuts
they aim to carry out is unprecedented since the second world war.
The £6.2 billion -worth
of cuts announced for 2010-11 by Tory chancellor, George Osborne, and
his Liberal Democrat partner-in-crime, millionaire David Laws, is only
the start. It is the "end of the [mythical] age of plenty and the start
of the age of austerity", according to them – as if such a change could
be enacted as easily as changing one of their expensive suits.
Professor Brian Ashcroft,
policy director of the Fraser of Allander Institute at Strathclyde
University, suggests that public-sector job losses in Scotland could top
60,000 over the next four years: "The public probably don’t realise what
we are facing. We are set to see a cut in spending unprecedented in
recent history".
With one in four of all jobs
in Scotland dependent on the public sector ,
the proposed cuts will have a devastating
impact. Already, in the NHS across Scotland, health boards are axing
thousands of jobs. This is not in response to Tory-Lib Dem savagery, but
a consequence of the cuts of the outgoing New Labour government. Two
days after the coalition came into being, health authorities in Scotland
announced budget cuts of up to 5,000 jobs in the next two years –
including frontline nursing and midwifery posts.
Freezing vacancies in the NHS
and now the civil service will soon be joined by effective pay cuts
across the public sector – made worse by rising inflation. Local
government workers in Scotland are facing the threat of three years of
pay cuts under an offer tabled by their employer, CoSLA.
Nick Clegg will have to be
reminded that ,
before the election, he warned that Britain would face social unrest on
the scale of Greece – unless the public was convinced of the need for
deep cuts on the scale ‘required’. Ironically, he and his MPs will be
largely responsible for unleashing the huge backlash that will greet
this new government.
The outcome of the election
has angered and dismayed many in Scotland. The Lib Dems have been
particularly targeted because they opened the gates to the ‘toxic
Tories’ – who were driven, once again ,
to the margins of politics in Scotland, winning just
one seat and 15% of the vote. There is no way that a Tory government
would have been perceived as legitimate with only one out of 59 Scottish
MPs – 85% of voters in Scotland voted for ‘anyone but the Tories’.
The Lib Dems will pay a huge
price for this in Scotland ,
and in many parts of England and Wales as well.
Already there have been reports of resignations of party activists in
protest. The massive opposition to cuts on this scale will, at a certain
stage, split the Lib Dems apart – some of them may well end up being
absorbed into the Tory party. One Scottish Lib Dem Member of the
Scottish Parliament commented: "The truth is we are deeply divided. Some
of the Orange Book people are happy to move to the right and they don’t
care about the position here".
The widespread fear of a Tory
government actually saw an increase in Labour’s vote in Scotland as the
mood of ‘lesser evilism’ dominated the election. Labour won more than
one million votes, 41 MPs, with 42% of the poll – an increase of over
2.5% compared to 2005. This compared with Labour’s 29% in Britain as a
whole , and its 25%
share of the poll in England. In 20 seats in Scotland, Labour MPs have a
majority of more than 10,000.
The Scottish National Party
(SNP) also suffered. It had set a target of winning 20 MPs. In the end,
it secured only six, losing Glasgow East to Labour – a seat it had won
in a by -election in 2008. The SNP’s 20% of the
poll was a small increase of 2% and put the nationalists in second place
in percentage terms – ahead of the Lib Dems on 16.5%, although they won
eleven seats.
The Westminster cuts
coalition has only twelve representatives in Scotland and 33% of the
vote. A majority or minority Tory government with only one MP in
Scotland would never have been accepted as legitimate in Scotland and
would have led to a significant sharpening in national tension.
While David Cameron and Clegg
hope that the addition of the eleven Lib Dem MPs will ‘legitimise’ their
government in Scotland, in reality ,
they will not be accepted as being representative.
That is especially the case given that the coalition’s representation is
overwhelmingly in the rural areas. Large swathes of working-class areas,
including the main cities and the central belt of Scotland, can muster
only two coalition MPs between them. The anger and opposition to the
government will increase dramatically over the next weeks and months as
the savage cuts they plan begin to bite.
The coalition has moved
quickly to offer an olive branch to the SNP government in the Scottish
parliament. Cameron met with SNP leader, Alex Salmond ,
within a week of becoming prime minister and
there is an agreement that Scotland’s share of the £6.2 billion cuts
package for 2010-11 will be postponed until 2011-12. A further £180
million of fossil fuel taxes may be transferred to Scotland as well.
Parts of the Calman commission report, which proposed increased powers
for the Scottish parliament, are likely to be introduced quickly. And
further discussions over more substantial fiscal measures, in an attempt
to placate the mood in Scotland, are possible over the next few years.
The SNP has grabbed the offer
to postpone Scotland’s share of the cuts with both hands. Not least
because there is an election for the Scottish parliament in May 2011
which the SNP is hoping to win. The SNP, however, is being increasingly
exposed as a government of cuts and has put up no resistance, other than
hot air, to the draconian austerity measures that are planned. On the
one hand , it has
offered a ‘constructive working relationship’ with the Tory-Lib Dem
coalition. On the other, it has warned of the impact of the cuts to
come. What the SNP has refused to do is prepare any sort of campaign to
resist the attacks that have already begun.
In the run -up
to the general election, the Tories promised to slash £5 billion (15%)
from the Scottish budget over the first three years of any new
government. Cuts of that magnitude would decimate the public sector, in
particular the jobs and, therefore, the services that are organically
connected to them.
In an act of extreme irony ,
Labour in Scotland is already positioning
itself as a ‘clean hands’ alternative to the governments of cuts in
London and Edinburgh. Reduced to opposition at Westminster and Holyrood,
Labour’s tactics will be to attack the SNP and the Tory-Lib Dem
coalition and hope to win the Scottish election next May. At least in
words, Labour in Scotland has the luxury of talking more ‘left’ –
opposing the parties of cuts – and of being prepared to give tacit
support to workers in struggle as well. This is likely to lead to a
period where Labour’s support will hold up over the next year in the
run-up to the Scottish elections – in the absence of a significant left
alternative emerging. This, in turn, can temporarily complicate the
situation, especially in the unions, for the necessary steps to break
from Labour and for a new working-class party to be built.
Thirteen years of New Labour ,
anti-working class governments acted as the
gatekeeper for the return of a Tory government. After all, it was the
New Labour chancellor, Alistair Darling, who promised that, if elected,
Labour’s cuts would be "worse than those of Margaret Thatcher". Under
the leadership of Tony Blair and Gordon Brown, the Labour Party was
driven to the right, embracing the free market and neo-liberal
capitalism. In its present form, it offers no alternative for workers
and trade unionists searching for political representation. The
frontrunners for the Labour leadership contest – the Oxbridge-educated
Miliband brothers – will continue the Blair/Brown pro-capitalist
ideology.
Under the conditions that
prevailed in Scotland, with a powerful mood of lesser evilism, votes for
the Scottish Trade Unionist and Socialist Coalition (STUSC) were modest.
The overwhelming mood in working -class areas
was to stop the Tories at all costs. This made it difficult to convince
people to vote for us, although there was widespread sympathy for our
message that we should not have to pay for a crisis we did not create.
STUSC stood in ten seats, including four in Glasgow. The campaign spoke
to over half-a-million people, warning of what was to come, whoever won
the election. The turnouts at the public meetings were good, ranging
from 35 to 80. And many new people looking to organise a fight-back can
be won to the socialist movement as a result.
Tommy Sheridan ,
in Glasgow South West, received the highest
socialist vote in Scotland and the third-highest for TUSC in Britain,
with 931 votes, 3%. Ray Gunnion, of the International Socialists and the
Lanarkshire Socialist Alliance, won 609 votes in Motherwell and Wishaw,
the second-highest socialist vote. Other members of the International
Socialists who stood were Jim McFarlane in Dundee West (357, 1%), Brian
Smith in Glasgow South (351, 1%), and Gary Clark in Edinburgh East (274,
0.7%). International Socialists members stood in four of the ten seats
that STUSC contested.
The International Socialists
believe that these modest votes, and those won by TUSC in England and
Wales , are a step
forward and should be built on. We support the idea that a TUSC-type of
coalition should be continued and used to help prepare a united left and
trade union based challenge for the Scottish elections next May. The
need for working-class political representation is even more acute
today.
Alongside this ,
however, we need to build a coalition of
resistance to the savagery that is being perpetrated by this vicious
cuts government. As a first step, the 22 June emergency Tory-Lib Dem
budget should be met by trade union and community organised rallies in
cities and towns across Scotland in protest against cuts and in defence
of jobs and services. Members of the International Socialists in
Scotland are helping to initiate these protests in union branches.
A mass demonstration led by
the trade unions and involving the communities needs to be organised. It
is time that the TUC and the STUC called such a demonstration as part of
a united campaign across the public sector. If they are not prepared to
do so , those unions
that want to organise a fight-back to stop the cuts should name the day
for mass demonstrations. Industrial action across the public-sector
unions, including preparing a 24-hour general strike, will also be on
the agenda at a certain stage.
It is vital that ,
as part of this campaign, a clear alternative
to the logic of the cuts is put forward. Democratic public ownership of
the banking system and the rest of the major companies that dominate the
economy, taxing the rich and big business, cancelling spending on
nuclear weapons, can all form part of a socialist alternative to
capitalism and the parties of cuts which defend that system.
The capitalists and their new
Tory -Lib Dem government have declared war on
working-class people. We need to organise to fight these attacks and lay
the basis for a mass workers’ party armed with socialist ideas that will
challenge the logic of capitalism that says we should pay the price for
their economic crisis.
Philip Stott
Socialist Party Scotland to be launched
THE SCOTTISH section of the
Committee for a Workers’ International – the International Socialists –
is changing its name to Socialist Party Scotland.
The new organisation will be
launched at a rally in Glasgow on 10 June. Speaking at the rally will be
Joe Higgins, Socialist Party Ireland MEP ,
and Hannah Sell, Socialist Party deputy
general secretary in England and Wales, as well as trade unionists and
socialists from Scotland.
We have chosen this new name
because we believe that it allows us to have a clearer banner that will
help attract new young people and workers to the ranks of the CWI. It
also has the distinct advantage of making a direct link with our sister
parties in England, Wales and Ireland which are also known as Socialist
Party.
We will continue to work to
build Solidarity–Scotland’s Socialist Movement, alongside Tommy Sheridan ,
and help to develop TUSC as a step towards
building a new mass workers’ party.
|