Two years in power
Obama fails to deliver
"YOU WOULD be hard-pressed to identify a piece of
legislation that we have proposed out there that, net, is not good for
businesses", said Barack Obama before this year’s US midterm elections.
"We are pro-growth. We are fierce advocates for a thriving, dynamic free
market". (Bloomberg.com, 2 October)
On the 2008 campaign trail, Obama was greeted by
huge crowds based on his promises to attack special interests and abuses
of corporate power. He promised to usher in a new era of progressive
politics. Those seem like days from a bygone era as his supporters have
had to grapple with an administration that quickly shifted to the right,
failing to deliver on its promises. Instead of resting on its popular
mandate to make change, his administration has disappointed its most
ardent supporters by failing to enact any fundamental progressive
changes.
Once in power, Obama surrounded himself with Wall
Street executives and conservative foreign policy spokespersons. He
handed over key positions of authority for economic policy to leading
big-business figures. The appointees to his 17-member economic advisory
board included billionaire Warren Buffet and CEOs and senior executives
of Google, Hyatt Hotels, Time Warner, Xerox and JP Morgan Chase.
Most startlingly, his economic team did not contain
a single representative from the labour movement, which gave hundreds of
millions of dollars to Obama and the Democrats. Nor did it have any
representatives from any other social movement organisations.
While campaigning, he railed against George W Bush’s
reckless foreign policy in Iraq and made promises of a speedy withdrawal
from Iraq. However, once elected, he weakened his timetable for
withdrawal from Iraq and then escalated the war in Afghanistan.
At the end of 2009, he announced a surge of 30,000
more troops to Afghanistan, on top of the 21,000 soldiers he ordered
there earlier that year. He also continued the Bush doctrine of using
private forces like Blackwater (ie, mercenaries), whose actions are
effectively outside of US and international law.
Despite Obama declaring the end of active US
involvement in Iraq, the US is leaving a country ravaged by its bombing
and occupation. After over seven years of occupation, electricity is
available only a few hours per day. Political tensions are so great the
government has been unable to meet. Also, this is not a total
withdrawal. Fifty thousand US troops are to remain ‘on base’ but
available to become active when necessary.
This year has seen US casualties in Afghanistan rise
to a record level. The WikiLeaks documents describe an occupation that
is on the ropes and has failed in all its objectives. In the meantime
the occupation continues, with returning soldiers suffering from huge
medical problems and military families suffering huge hardship. On top
of this must be added the colossal destruction and loss of life
inflicted on the people of Afghanistan.
Obama has failed in his promises to workers on the
economy. Tens of millions suffer from unemployment, foreclosures and
evictions. The stimulus money was temporary and is now running out. Two
years after the start of the great recession, 15 million workers are
still officially counted as unemployed, 8.5 million are working part
time but need full-time work, and 3.9 million have given up looking.
There has been no bounce-back on this recession. Forty-five percent of
those unemployed have been out of work for over six months. Yet the
Obama administration is still insisting they must wait until the market
provides new jobs.
This has fallen particularly hard on African
Americans, who had hoped that the first African-American president would
be focused on addressing the issues of poverty, lack of jobs, and the
massive injustices of the criminal justice system that particularly hit
their communities.
On education, the Obama administration is leading
the charge to push a right-wing agenda. His Race to the Top initiative
was built on Bush’s discredited No Child Left Behind education policies.
In order for states to receive additional education funds, the
administration insists they take steps toward the development of charter
schools, weaken teacher seniority, and pay teachers based on the test
scores of their students.
The main promise the Obama administration made to
win labour support was to enact the Employee Free Choice Act (EFCA),
which would have made it easier for unions to organise new members.
Labour leaders then repeated this promise as a key reason why workers
should once again vote Democrat. Since then, the only activity on EFCA
has been Democrats dropping a key provision from it: the right of
workers to form a union by signing up a majority of workers who are in
favour of it. EFCA has now almost vanished from view.
Millions were hoping that the removal of the party
of oil from power would open the door to a radical change in the
environmental policies of the US. While certain initiatives have been
taken, Obama has failed to take a bold approach to reversing the
backward position of the US on global warming and to shift its energy
policies away from carbon-based fossil fuels.
The Deepwater Horizon BP disaster found the
administration continuing the oil-drilling policy of the Bush
administration and leaving in place the same corrupt officials of the
past. Obama’s statement a few weeks before the spill: "Oil rigs today
generally don’t cause spills – they are technologically very advanced",
speaks volumes about his disastrous policy of making concessions to
Republicans in order to win possible votes.
Here was a golden opportunity for the president to
use the power of his office to shift the debate on energy. A massive
federal programme to create millions of jobs in new green industries
could have begun to put millions back to work and lay the basis for new
industries and the retooling of key sections of the US economy. Instead,
Obama’s failure to move decisively against BP and allowing it to control
the clean-up activities seriously weakened efforts to contain this
disaster.
On the campaign trail, Obama promised to take on the
insurance companies and corporate health care interests and to provide
‘universal healthcare’. Most people had a vision of a healthcare system
where the government would step in to ensure everyone was covered from
cradle to grave while shackling corporate interests.
What they did not expect was healthcare ‘reform’
constructed around the private drug companies, hospitals and insurance
companies that are responsible for all the inequities in the healthcare
‘system’ in the US. Popular support slipped away once people saw that,
instead of healthcare becoming a right, it was going to be a duty backed
up with fines; that insurance companies were going to be further
entrenched in the system; and that quality healthcare policies were
going to be taxed.
The central issue was the refusal of the Obama
administration to put forward a single-payer system in which the
government provides one insurance policy that covers everyone. By
cutting out the profits of insurance companies, this could have been
enacted without any extra cost to the public. Also, such a change was
very popular.
The administration has failed to deliver on issue
after issue that was important to those who voted for Obama. For
example, Democrats failed to use their majority to act decisively to end
Don’t Ask Don’t Tell, which discriminates against lesbian, gay, bisexual
and transgender people in the military. They also failed to provide
legal security to the millions of undocumented immigrant workers by
implementing an amnesty programme, as Republican president, Ronald
Reagan, did in 1986.
Unfortunately, Obama’s promises were just that:
promises. The Democrats are part of big business’s two-party system.
Once the Republicans and Bush were discredited, corporations shifted
their resources to support their alternative political party, the
Democrats. Under Obama, the Democrats have delivered for big business.
Now big business has its alternative party, the Republicans, bolstered
by their mid-term results, ready to profit from the disappointment of
those who had supported the Democrats.
Tony Wilsdon
Socialist Alternative (CWI USA)