Un-democracy in Sheffield
OUR OWN experiences of ‘democracy’ here in Sheffield
certainly confirm the points made in Banana Republic UK, reviewed in the
February edition of Socialism Today, No.155.
In 2010, we expected that our vote in the Graves
Park ward would be squeezed because of the general election. What we had
not expected that our vote would apparently tumble from 271 in 2008 to
only 44 – particularly since we polled 84 votes in the adjoining ward
where we stood for the first time and had done no canvassing! There were
two reasons for the low vote: our key polling station was one of the
handful in Sheffield where inadequate resources left hundreds of voters
still queuing outside when the polling station closed and, more
seriously, a bundle of 100 counted votes disappeared before the final
count was announced.
Election officials refused to recount, despite the
fact that an Independent candidate was willing to support our complaint.
As the Socialism Today review pointed out, our only recourse
would have been to mount an extremely expensive legal challenge.
There is a clear attitude of neglect towards minor
candidates’ democratic rights. Exactly the same error had happened in
2008 – although in this case our agent spotted the missing bundle before
the final count was announced. In 2011, counting of our vote was
switched to another ward’s counting table without informing our
candidate or agent. Neither were we consulted on the recounted vote –
indeed, we had to ask one of the counting officers for the figures
before the public announcement.
One change that has occurred in Sheffield has been
to switch the count from one of the polling stations in the ward to a
centralised venue (the Arena). Counting in a small hall locally made it
much easier to track what was happening and to raise issues with the
election officials. This is particularly the case with postal votes,
which all used to be opened in the counting hall when polls closed – now
they are opened centrally but over three days, making it impossible for
working candidates or election agents to spare the time to attend. The
potential for votes to go missing has been vastly increased.
The change has also robbed people in poor areas of a
small, but undoubtedly welcome, supplement to their income. Counting in
the ward meant that counters, mainly women, could safely walk to the
count and back home. The centralisation of counting in a building in a
non-residential zone means that it is only accessible by car or taxi if
counting goes beyond midnight (as it did in 2011).
In the end, however, the replacement of elected
governments in Greece and Italy by technocrats shows just how much
capitalism really cares about democracy.
Jeremy Short, Sheffield Heeley