The horrors of Stalinism
Everything Flows
Vasily Grossman, Vintage Books, 2011, £8-99
Reviewed by Dylan Murphy
EVERYTHING FLOWS is Vasily
Grossman’s last novel. It remained unfinished at his death in 1964.
While it is only a quarter of the length of his epic war novel Life and
Fate, Everything Flows is much broader in scope. Grossman deals with a
wide variety of issues that cover life in Stalinist Russia from the
1930s to the 1950s.
The central story is about
the struggle of a fifty-year-old man, Ivan Grigoryevich, to settle into
normal life after thirty years in the Siberian labour camps. This story
is skilfully interwoven with chapters about life for women in the prison
camps, Moscow’s prisons in 1937, the Ukrainian famine of 1932-33, and
the role of Lenin and Stalin in creating the Soviet state.
Grossman uses Ivan and
various characters in the story to try and explain the different motives
of people for their passive or active participation in the Stalinist
terror of the late 1930s. This led to the imprisonment of millions of
Soviet citizens in labour camps and the deaths of several millions more.
Ivan visits his cousin at his
apartment in Moscow. His cousin, Nikolay Andreyivich, is a scientist
whose career had blossomed during the late thirties’ terror and its
revival in the early fifties. This is due to his willingness to go along
with the government’s persecution of ‘enemies of the state’. He recalls
one meeting at work where he voted in favour of a resolution calling for
the death penalty of Rykov and Bukharin, who were Old Bolsheviks.
Grossman himself shared this sense of moral humiliation. He signed a
declaration of support for the show trials of Old Bolsheviks who were
accused of ‘Trotskyist-fascist’ treason in the late 1930s.
As Grossman points out, the
majority of people in the Soviet Union passively acquiesced with the
terror out of fear. However, there was a minority of people who did
refuse to collaborate in any shape or form. The members of the Left
Opposition, who followed Trotsky’s ideas, were arrested in their
thousands and sent to labour camps in Siberia. Not only did they refuse
to collaborate in any way, they continued their protests in the labour
camps.
The novel moves to the
Ukrainian famine of 1932-33 which led to the deaths of several million
peasants. Ivan Grigoryevich has a dream in which he calls out to his
mother. Ivan’s landlady comes to console him. She proceeds to describe
the different events that lead up to this man-made famine.
During 1931-33 the Stalinist
government tried to force the peasant farmers to join the state
organised collective farms. The peasants resisted this crude attempt at
coercion and the amount of land under cultivation shrank and so did the
crop yield. Meanwhile the authorities sent troops into the villages to
confiscate grain and even the seed fund from the peasants. The
consequences were catastrophic as it led to a terrible famine that
killed several million.
The most moving chapter of
the book is a mere four pages where Grossman describes the death of one
peasant family from starvation. It is incredibly sad and told through
the husband’s eyes who gives every crumb of food to his wife and son and
so dies first. As he is dying he feels a sense of despair, "as he looked
at his wife, already disfigured by the dropsy of death, and at his dying
son".
Grossman’s description of the
Ukrainian famine, which is a lesser known chapter of the Stalinist
terror, is incredibly powerful and captures the fear and suffering of
that period. The Ukrainian famine was caused by the abrupt shift in
Stalin’s political and economic policies when he decided to impose the
forced collectivisation of agriculture upon the millions of peasants in
the Ukraine. By late 1927 Stalin had defeated the Left Opposition, led
by Trotsky, within the Russian Communist Party. In a bid to consolidate
his grip on power Stalin used this ultra-left turn in economic policy as
a platform to attack the policies of the Right Opposition. They were
expelled from the Communist Party leaving Stalin as the unopposed head
of the Soviet state.
Having described the horrors
of the Stalinist terror Grossman devotes the last section of the novel
to trying to explain how the Stalinist dictatorship came into being. He
argues at length that Lenin was driven by a fanatical desire for power
and was tragically destined to merely continue the thousand-year-old
tradition of progress and slavery that had existed in Russia. But
Grossman’s pessimistic analysis of Bolshevism as a mere continuation of
the age -old Russian tradition of slavery is mistaken.
The Stalinist dictatorship
that developed in the late 1920s and 1930s was not a continuation of
Russian slavery. It was rooted in the political and economic
circumstances at the end of world war one. Capitalism broke at its
weakest link and the Bolsheviks took power in October 1917. The
Bolsheviks based their whole strategy on the concept of the revolution
in Russia spreading to the economically more advanced countries of
Western Europe. Lenin and Trotsky knew that if the revolution was
confined to economically backward Russia then it could not survive as a
democratic workers’ and peasants’ state.
Tragically, the post-war
revolutionary wave ebbed away leaving the young workers’ state in Russia
isolated. This isolation paved the way for the gradual emergence of a
state bureaucracy that rationed out the meagre resources of the state in
its favour. It led to the destruction of the workers’ democracy that
prevailed in the Communist Party, trade unions and the soviets. Once
entrenched this bureaucracy saw Stalin as its saviour and he became its
instrument for wiping out all real and imagined opponents of its
privileges. Hence the Stalinist terror of the 1930s.
Grossman’s novel does us all
a great service in describing the horrors of the terror and offers a
unique insight into this turbulent period of history. It is unfortunate
that he never lived to finish this last great work.