
A key event in the unwinding of Keir Starmer’s floundering premiership was the resignation, on June 11, of the previously ultra-loyalist John Healey as defence secretary. Coming on the eve of the Makerfield by-election which saw Andy Burnham return to Westminster, and just weeks before a NATO summit to re-commit its member states to a 5% of gross domestic product (GDP) military-related spending target by 2035, it was a coup de grâce moment.
Healey departed, complaining that the Starmer government’s proposed defence investment plan “falls well short of what is required for defence and the country at this dangerous time” and that he could not, therefore, present it to parliament. The investment plan was meant to deliver the recommendations of the Labour government’s 2025 Strategic Defence Review, which argued for a transformation of the UK’s armed forces. From a military still shaped by the tasks “of the post-Cold War era” – for “conflicts primarily fought against non-state actors on Europe’s periphery and beyond” – and not for the new era begun by Russia’s “inflection point” invasion of Ukraine in 2022, “with state-on-state war” back on the agenda. But the investment plan only proposed a 2.7% of GDP spend by 2030 harrumphed Healey, “the date when NATO has warned we could face a Russian attack”. (The Guardian, 1 July)
Read more